Source: ADM 199/1784 Proceedings of
U-boat assessment committee. Attack on U-boat by Sharpshooter
Précis
of Attack by SHARPSHOOTER
Date:
3.3.43
Time:
2136
Position: 63° 32’ N, 23° 05’ W
Weather: Wind SW Force 5, Visibility 5 miles
Duty: Rescue search in company with HMS HAZARD.
NARRATIVE
At 2030
SHARPSHOOTER, stationed one mile on the port beam of HAZARD steering 234°
speed 14 knots, obtained RDF contact bearing 086° 1,800 yards. This
contact was lost on turning towards and not regained.
At 2120
another RDF contact was obtained bearing 064° 3,000 yards. At 2134, when
the bearing had drawn aft by 40° and the range had been reduced by 1,000
yards, SHARPSHOOTER turned towards and increased to full speed. The
contact was held to 1,800 yards and hydrophone effect was heard by the
asdic operator who, shortly after, obtained contact bearing 130° 1,600
yards. The contact was then attacked.
No. of
attack |
1st |
2nd |
3rd |
Time
|
2142 |
2154 |
2205 |
Doppler |
Closing |
Closing |
Closing |
H E |
|
|
HE
whistle and rattle effect |
Movement of target |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Range
of losing contact |
200
yards |
100
yards |
500
yards |
Time
to fire obtained by |
Stop
watch |
Stop
watch |
Stop
watch |
No. of
D/C’s |
2 |
3 |
3 |
Depth
settings |
500
feet |
350 &
500 feet |
350 &
500 feet |
Remarks |
- |
Throwers failed due to bad drill |
HE at
1,000 yards |
It is
stated that after original attack (described as a counter attack)
difficulty was experienced in maintaining contact due to a defective
oscillator. Contact was regained astern after the third attack but lost at
2308.
SURFACE
EVIDENCE
An RDF
contact was held to 1,600 yards but the U-boat was not sighted. There was
no evidence of damage.
ASDIC
EVIDENCE
No
recorder trace has been received and the oscillator is stated to have been
giving very weak results. As stated above severe rattling and whistle
effect was heard at about 1,000 yards when closing for the third attack.
This was thought to mean that the U-boat was temporarily surfaced.
CO’S
OPINION
U-boat
probably damaged. No conclusive evidence.
RAD’s
OPINION
No
evidence of damage to a U-boat, first attack should have been a deliberate
attack and shallower settings used. Depth charge drill seems to have been
poor and it is considered that a full pattern should have been used for
all attacks.
DECISION
OF U-BOAT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
There is
no relevant tracking evidence of the presence of a U-boat in this
vicinity. On the other hand the phenomena are consistent with the presence
of a U-boat and on balance the attack is assessed as ‘U-boat present.
Insufficient evidence of damage’.
5th
April 1943