Halcyon Class Minesweepers HMS Sharpshooter
Attack on U Boat 13.9.42
 
  Back   

 

  

Source: ADM 199/1783 Proceedings of U-boat assessment committee. U-boat attack by Sharpshooter

 Précis of Attack by SHARPSHOOTER

Date:                13.9.42
Time:               1131

Position:           75° 54’ N, 08° 49’ E

Depth of Water: 1,150 fathoms

Weather:          Wind NNW Force 5, Visibility 2 to 5 miles        

NARRATIVE

SHARPSHOOTER was in position ‘W’ astern of Convoy PQ18, when at 1131, a firm contact, bearing 110° at a range of 2,100 yards was obtained. The ship turned towards and increased speed to attack, using a 5° throw off. The first pattern was dropped at 1135 ½ . Three further attacks were carried out and the details of all these attacks are as follows: 

No. of attack

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

Time

1135 ½

1140 ½

1203 ½

1216

Inclination

Opening

None

Opening

Opening

H E

None

None

Yes and whistle effect

Yes

Did target appear to move

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Range at which contact was lost

Instant echoes

Instant echoes

Instant echoes

Instant echoes

Time to fire obtained by

Recorder

Recorder

Recorder

Recorder

No. of D/C’s

5

4

4

4

Depth settings

150, 250, 350 & 500 feet

250 & 350 feet

250, 350 & 500 feet

150, 250 and 350 feet

Remarks

Conning tower partially surfaced

 

Conning tower shown

Air bubbles

After the first attack the U-boat’s conning tower partially broke surface, and a portion of the U-boat is reported to have surfaced again at 1204 i.e. just after the third attack. SHARPSHOOTER states that after this attack she became directing vessel to enable TARTAR to attack but that the latter lost contact during the run in and broke off the attack. TARTAR did however carry out two attacks on contacts which could not definitely be classified as ‘submarine’. It is not clear however whether TARTAR was attacking the same contact as the one attacked by SHARPSHOOTER. The attack by TARTAR are the subject of a separate report. 

Air bubbles were seen after the fourth attack and contact was lost shortly after. The hunt was then broken off and the ships returned to their stations on the screen. SHARPSHOOTER states that full patterns were not fired owing to a failure of the firing gear. 

SURFACE EVIDENCE

As stated in the narrative. The conning tower of the U-boat was seen on two occasions, the first being shortly after the first attack and the second shortly after the third attack. It is noted, however, that TARTAR, who was assisting in this hunt, presumably did not see the conning tower on either occasion as she makes no mention of it in her report. Air bubbles were also seen shortly before contact was finally lost. It is noted that depth settings were between 150 and 500 feet. It would appear, however, that the U-boat was shallow, a position which is borne out by the fact that in each attack contact was held on instant echoes. 

ASDIC EVIDENCE

Asdic conditions were described as good. The recorder trace has evidently faded considerably but the echo marks are clearly visible for most of the time. They have the appearance of being a ‘submarine’ contact though in one or two places they are rather ragged indicating possibly that contact was being held either on or through the wake. 

CO’S OPINION

A most promising attack. The U-boat appeared to be blowing tanks after the fourth attack. 

RAD’S OPINION

None expressed. 

SUBMARINE TRACKING ROOM’S OPINION

Analysis of tracking evidence of U-boat operations against PQ18 tends to suggest that three U-boats of the total operating may never have returned to base. 

DECISION OF U-BOAT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE

Insufficient evidence of damage. 

16th November 1942

Home | U Boat attack Sharpshooter | U Boat attack 2 | U Boat attack 3 | Escort Orders QP15 | U655

This site was last updated 17 Januar 2012