ADM
199 1782 Proceedings of U-boat assessment committee. Attack on U
boat by NIGER
Précis
of Attack by NIGER
Date: 1.4.42
Time: 1945
Position: 70° 22’ N, 36° 10’ E.
Depth of Water: 100 fathoms
Weather: Wind light, Sea calm, Weather overcast with snow
showers, Visibility 10 – 500 yards in snow.
NARRATIVE
NIGER was carrying out a search for the whaler,
SULLA, which had become detached from the Convoy PQ13. At 1945,
whilst zigzagging to the Eastward, NIGER sighted three torpedoes
approaching from her port quarter. Course was altered to comb the
tracks and NIGER then proceeded at full speed along the tracks which
could be easily seen in the flat calm sea. A very good contact was
obtained at a range of 4,000 yards and 60° on the starboard bow.
NIGER turned towards and carried out an attack with five depth
charges set to 150, 250 and 350 feet. Unfortunately NIGER had a
defective asdic dome owing to which contact was distinctly woolly
when within 20° of the bow. Nevertheless contact was held down to a
short range and the time to fire was obtained by recorder. Contact
was regained and a second attack was made with five depth charges
and using the same depth settings. Contact was lost after this
attack and although a thorough search was carried out no further
contact was obtained. At 0300 NIGER resumed her original search for
SULLA.
SURFACE EVIDENCE
Torpedo tracks were clearly seen on the calm
sea.
ASDIC EVIDENCE
Asdic conditions were good but NIGER found
results difficult to obtain owing to her leaky dome. The contact
appeared to move in both attacks and was held down to a short range.
A track chart has been forwarded.
CO’S OPINION
Both attacks were good and although there was no
indication of damage there was little doubt that some must have been
done.
RAD HF’s OPINION
The setting of the depth charges is considered
too deep in view of the fact that the U-boat would probably have
been at periscope depth to fire the torpedoes. In view of the deep
settings used and the crossing movement of the U-boat, a course to
pass ahead of the U-boat should have been steered and not one that
took the ship over it.
The movement of the contact between the first and
second attacks, as shown on the track chart, indicates the speed of
the U-boat as being approximately 20 knots. This is impossible and
it is for consideration whether either the second attack was carried
out on a non-sub, or whether an inaccuracy exists in the plot. The
search subsequent to contact being lost does not appear to have been
extended sufficiently far to the Northward in view of the fact that
the U-boat’s movement had until then been in a North Easterly
direction.
SUBMARINE TRACKING ROOM’S OPINION
Tracking evidence confirms the presence of a
U-boat but suggests that no damage was inflicted on it.
DECISION OF U-BOAT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
Insufficient evidence of damage.
18th June 1942